The Grand Design: the War of Tariffs

A new day has dawned and we’re a step closer to the Grand Design – the 2030 agenda where you’ll own nothing but be happy. Today we’ll take a brief look at the War of Tariffs. (I’ll use the “Grand Design” so that we may be able to distinguish my homebrew theory from the common talking points of the “New World Order” you’ll find around these parts.)

In the last article, we’ve already explored the goals of the Tariffs, that they’re likely a chapter towards the 4th Industrial Revolution and the Grand Design, and that it is likely something Joe Biden has failed to do when he held office. When the 4th Industrial Revolution is about introducing automatic workers in terms of AI and robotics, it would make sense that wealth and market distributions would be desired to remain within American soil.

Today we’ll have a brief look at the inner workings of the Tariffs.

Is inflation the issue here? In normal economic climates, the increase of Tariffs would mean a general increase of prices. But this point of time is anything but normal. First, we need to understand the significance of the 4th Industrial Revolution. I’d say it is similar to the time when Printing Press became available in France. The printing technology first pushed the emergence of Protestants, and subsequently the Reformation Wars, the fall of the Holy Roman Empire, the rise of Nationalism, and then the speed of the press benefitted from printing basically ensured the rise of the French Revolutionaries. The 4th Industrial Revolution will create a paradigm shift of human society where the technological corporations will rise to power. For this singular reason, inflation is only worth making a footnote of.

Secondly, the amounts of the Tariffs are a sharp surge. An increment of around 10% would mean yes inflation would likely happen. An increment of anything as substantial as 50% means it’s already a war, where businesses are forced to close down. This is similar to the Blockades used in history, where a navy would be parked outside the ports to impose a total shut down of maritime commerce of that country. Merchants could either reroute or completely stop their businesses. By any account, a Blockade was always treated as an act of war. Force would be employed to break through the enemy navy to regain control over the ports and trade routes. In modern times, it may not be necessary to send a fleet to blockade a port. The Tariffs of more than 100% ensure complete divorce of any business between the 2 belligerents.

Thirdly, the Tariffs applied globally with various levels, while the countries all react differently. Donald Trump’s reaction to countries who are willing to negotiate is to lift the Tariffs, while countries which have decided to retaliate get an even stiffer treatment. And this test of Philosopher’s Stone has tested which countries are amicable business partners, despite having differences, and which countries are radical adversaries.

What are wars and conflicts? It is the transition from one status of peace into a different desired status of new peace. We have already drawn the conclusion that the new peace will be a much more desirable environment towards a completely reformed economic structure, power structure, with the United States of America controlling the technology of the 2030 final status, as well as the means to produce the technological components to install Smart Cities across the globe.

Summarising the points made, it would seem that the Tariffs have moved the conflicts forwards. Now, it is currently at full speed towards the 2030 Grand Design. The world is currently at war and economic power will shift rapidly. And the trade partners in the coming endeavours have been discovered, while adversaries will be eliminated.

We are in the transition. Our societies will change rapidly. Don’t be surprised.

+ posts
  • Related Posts

    To Transcend Fate, One Must Begin with Introspective Scrutiny

    As a legal professional, I have always placed paramount importance on evidence in all matters. In principle, I should be a staunch advocate of empirical science, maintaining an objective distance…

    “One Person, One Letter” Revisited: An Examination of the Epochs for the Establishment of a Novel Course Toward BNO Parity of Rights

    As I put pen to paper today, my heart is filled with a myriad of complex emotions. First and foremost, I wish to extend my deepest gratitude to all friends…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    To Transcend Fate, One Must Begin with Introspective Scrutiny

    • By henry
    • December 8, 2025
    • 342 views
    To Transcend Fate, One Must Begin with Introspective Scrutiny

    “One Person, One Letter” Revisited: An Examination of the Epochs for the Establishment of a Novel Course Toward BNO Parity of Rights

    • By henry
    • November 22, 2025
    • 4345 views
    “One Person, One Letter” Revisited: An Examination of the Epochs for the Establishment of a Novel Course Toward BNO Parity of Rights

    Authenticity, Resilience, and Purpose: Reflections on Legal Practice and Personal Fulfillment

    • By henry
    • October 29, 2025
    • 539 views
    Authenticity, Resilience, and Purpose: Reflections on Legal Practice and Personal Fulfillment

    The grand design – Idolistic Theocracy: the acceptance of casting stones

    The grand design – Idolistic Theocracy: the acceptance of casting stones

    From Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: The Trajectory Toward Democracy in Hong Kong – If the World Appears Inadequate, It Is Because You and I Have Fashioned It Thus

    • By henry
    • October 16, 2025
    • 454 views
    From Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: The Trajectory Toward Democracy in Hong Kong – If the World Appears Inadequate, It Is Because You and I Have Fashioned It Thus

    A Complex Chess Game Intertwining Law, Politics, and Human Rights

    • By henry
    • October 11, 2025
    • 473 views
    A Complex Chess Game Intertwining Law, Politics, and Human Rights