henry
The crowdfunding initiative aimed at securing BNO equality has officially commenced. As I previously articulated, while it is imperative to remain vigilant against pressures exerted by the Chinese, Hong Kong, and British governments, we must equally be wary of the dissenting voices that may arise from our fellow compatriots in Hong Kong.
Predictably, shortly after the inauguration of this crowdfunding campaign, other Hong Kong organizations began to follow suit, almost as if they were mere shadows. Perhaps my concerns are excessive, but even some well-intentioned organizations have expressed confusion regarding this phenomenon. The role of news media should primarily be to encourage public engagement with their own content, rather than resorting to crowdfunding efforts. From a business standpoint, if a news platform seeks to expand its offerings, there exists no necessity for fundraising through such means. I genuinely fail to discern any pressing need for the immediate implementation of these plans. Nevertheless, I conveyed to my team that such matters are of little consequence; what truly matters is that our friendly organizations comprehend the essence of our actions. Indeed, actions speak louder than words.
What is even more amusing is the emergence of comments asserting, “Raising over £10,000 in merely two days is remarkably swift for our community. Some suspect that early donations were orchestrated to enhance credibility.” Perhaps those who profess to represent the interests of Hong Kong have not fully grasped the profound significance of BNO equality within the psyche of Hongkongers.
The true essence of equality transcends the mere aspiration for a complete nationality passport; it embodies a profound call for historical justice. As I have previously noted, during the Sino-British negotiations, the voices of Hongkongers were conspicuously absent, rendering them powerless in determining their own destinies. Even today, we remain largely in the dark regarding the motivations behind Britain’s repeated concessions to China. It is only through the persistent efforts and earnest appeals of our community that we may compel the British government to confront its historical missteps and render justice to the people of Hong Kong.
Why have I chosen this moment to take action? Because I have long awaited an opportune time—specifically, when the British government exhibits vulnerabilities in its handling of Hong Kong affairs. Over the past twenty-eight years, the British government has consistently maintained that “One Country, Two Systems” is functioning effectively. However, it was only following the enactment of the National Security Law in 2020 that they acknowledged the futility of self-deception and accepted accountability for their historical signing of a joint declaration that inadequately safeguarded the rights of Hong Kong civilians. Consequently, they introduced the BNO visa. With the continued relaxation of the BNO visa policy, we initially found ourselves devoid of an opportunity to advocate for equality. It was not until the Labour government proposed amendments to the extradition treaty concerning Hong Kong that the British government once again endeavoured to sell out the interests of the Hong Kong populace. This moment represents an ideal opportunity for us to remind the British government to confront its historical actions, tracing back to the origins of Hong Kong’s handover.
Why have I opted to pursue equality through legal avenues? The reason is simple: the law is my area of expertise. Every element of existence possesses its designated role, and every individual has unique strengths. If we aspire to enhance the world, we must dedicate ourselves to areas in which we excel, allowing us to achieve greater results with less effort. While I may not engage in street protests—not due to a lack of support, but rather a recognition of my limitations—I firmly believe that every individual has their own contributions to make. Although I adhere to Buddhist principles, I find it fitting to borrow a sentiment from Catholicism: the Creator has fashioned humanity in such a way that each person is unique, a complexity that remains elusive even to scientists. This illustrates the Creator’s magnificence, enabling us to complement one another’s strengths and weaknesses.
Certain Hong Kong organizations claim their responsibility lies in filtering information for Hongkongers in the UK. Yet, there are also representatives from these organizations who have candidly expressed that the complexities surrounding equality, laden with historical implications, are beyond their full comprehension, leading to hesitance in offering support. If you cannot fully grasp these nuances, how can you assume the responsibility of filtering information for others?
Additionally, numerous individuals have demanded comprehensive outlines of our litigation strategies and legal justifications, asserting they have perused all my writings yet remain unaware of my depth of understanding regarding the BNO issue. Such individuals are often unclear about the five areas of advocacy I have delineated. Following my explanations, they assert that without the direct conversion of BNO to British citizenship, equality cannot be claimed. I have repeatedly emphasized the meaning of equality, and it appears they either refuse to understand or are simply unable to do so. Nevertheless, I have reassured my team that this is inconsequential; we cannot compel everyone to align with our views. This encapsulates the essence of democracy and the principles underpinning capital markets.
Moreover, some organizations have suggested, “If a team of reputable lawyers had been assembled prior to launching the public fundraising campaign, it might have enhanced the campaign’s credibility and reassurance.” I must candidly convey that this is a matter concerning the people of Hong Kong; thus, I am willing to offer my assistance pro bono, as I too am a Hongkonger. However, this is not a concern for individuals of other nationalities; they will not provide legal services without compensation. Even with adequate funding, the number of individuals genuinely interested in this issue remains scant, rendering it challenging to capture the attention of the local legal community. The prompt response from Paul Harris SC can be attributed to his prior residency in Hong Kong, granting him a level of understanding and concern for the territory. For those who pose such inquiries, it is time to reassess your perspective; the world does not revolve around you. When we lack the power to advocate for ourselves, how can we expect the local legal community to agree to represent a group of Hongkongers who possess neither funds nor trustworthiness? It is time for you to mature, broaden your horizons, and expand your perspectives.
At present, we have received a response from the Home Office regarding the application for British citizenship from a Hongkonger who previously held a BDTC passport. In addition to Paul Harris SC, two international law barristers are currently deliberating their potential involvement, and we await the professional insights of our legal team.
Chinese version : BNO 平權之路：內外兼顧，方能致遠
眾籌Link ： https://gofund.me/042d7e3c
Related articles:
(Latest Update) BNO Equality Campaign – A Crowdfunded Legal Fight for Justice
Let Us Remind the Labour Party of the True Meaning of the Sino-British Joint Declaration
Hong Kong’s Fate: A Story of Broken Promises and a Fight for Future
Hong Kongers’ Quest for Equity in the UK: A Path Started Through Inquiry and Independent Thinking
BNO Equality Advocacy – Frequently Asked Questions on Achieving Rights & Justice
The Path to BNO Equality: Navigating the Challenges of Public Quality
📢 Join the “UK Life & Current Affairs Channel” (DOVC.co.uk) Community! 🇬🇧
👋 Want to stay up-to-date on the latest UK life information, news, current affairs, policy changes, or share experiences with fellow Brits? Welcome to join the UK Life & Current Affairs Channel (DOVC.co.uk) to discuss and share useful information together!
📌 Community Features: ✅ Real-time updates on UK current affairs and policies ✅ Exchange of information on UK life, immigration, work, study, etc. ✅ Mutual support with like-minded friends
📲 Join us now!
🔹 WhatsApp Group 👉 Click here to join 🔹 Facebook Fan Page 👉 Follow us
Welcome to join us and explore UK life together! 🎉
Henry Wong qualified as a solicitor in Hong Kong, England and Wales, Ireland and Scotland respective in 2014, 2018, 2024 and 2025. Henry is fluent in Cantonese, Mandarin, English, and Japanese, and he specialises in a broad range of legal matters, including family law (possessing significant experience in divorce, assets division, and child arrangements), criminal litigation, civil litigation, and international law, with a focus on human rights and criminal law. He additionally manages various immigration-related matters, encompassing refugee applications, settlement and naturalisation applications, work visa applications, and actively conducts BNO settlement and naturalisation seminars in the UK to provide professional information to communities in need.
Henry Wong is dedicated to public welfare and community affairs. He is currently the founder of Hong Kong Professionals CIC (hkpcic.org.uk) and Descendants of Victoria City (dovc.co.uk), where he actively participates in community building and consistently advocates for various human rights issues.
At present, Henry serves as a consultant solicitor for David Fenn & Co. in Hong Kong and Perilli & Ho Solicitors in London. He is also a legal link partner with Jones Whyte Solicitors in Scotland. His practice area is extensive, encompassing the sale and purchase of residential and commercial properties in both Hong Kong and the United Kingdom, immigration matters, various civil and criminal litigation cases, commercial and contractual matters, family disputes, wills and estate administration, as well as human rights law.
Outside of his professional commitments, Henry Wong enjoys sports and is a goalkeeper for an amateur football team. He also possesses a passion for wine, possesses a deep understanding of various types of alcoholic beverages, and is skilled in making cocktail.
黃律師於2014年成為香港執業律師，2018年取得英格蘭及威爾斯執業律師資格，2024年取得愛爾蘭註冊律師資格，並於2025年獲得蘇格蘭律師資格。黃律師精通廣東話、普通話、英語及日語，擅長處理多項法律事務，包括家事法（尤其於離婚、財產分配及子女撫養權安排方面經驗豐富）、刑事訴訟、民事訴訟，以及國際法（專注於人權及刑事領域）。此外，黃律師亦處理各類移民相關事宜，包括難民申請、定居及入籍申請、工作簽證申請等，並積極於英國舉辦BNO定居及入籍講座，為有需要的社群提供專業資訊。
黃律師熱心公益及地區事務，現為 Hong Kong Professionals CIC (hkpcic.org.uk) 及 Descendants of Victoria City (dovc.co.uk) 的創辦人，積極參與社區建設，並對不同人權議題持續發聲。
目前，黃律師擔任香港 David Fenn and Co. 律師行及英國 Perilli & Ho Solicitors 律師行的顧問律師，同時也是蘇格蘭 Jones Whyte Solicitors 的合作夥伴。其執業範圍廣泛，涵蓋香港及英國住宅及商業物業買賣、移民入境事務、各類民事及刑事訴訟、商業及合約事宜、家庭糾紛、遺囑及遺產處理，以及人權法等。
工作之餘，黃律師熱愛運動，擔任業餘足球隊的守門員。同時，他也對品酒情有獨鍾，對各類酒品均有深入研究，更擅長調製各式雞尾酒。
