henry
People frequently inquire about the distinctions between the legal frameworks of the United Kingdom and Hong Kong, given that Hong Kong has incorporated the British legal system, resulting in numerous parallels; however, the most significant divergence resides in the judicial attitudes. While I have previously elaborated on the variations within the family courts of both jurisdictions on my YouTube channel, this discourse aims to delve into the intricacies of criminal court proceedings.
In my experience handling such cases—be it coincidental or owing to the courts’ palpable understaffing—I often encounter situations where, on the eve of a trial, the court notifies us of a shortage of courtrooms, compelling solicitors and barristers to endure prolonged waits at the courthouse. Additionally, trials are frequently postponed due to the prosecution’s inadequate allocation of time. Seasoned legal practitioners understand the prudence of arriving equipped with a full day’s provisions, for unpredictability in courtroom schedules is a common lament.
Initially, I would inquire whether the court would reimburse our clients for legal fees and ancillary expenses—such as accommodation, transportation, and parking—upon notification late in the day that courtrooms are unavailable and proceedings are adjourned, particularly given our prior presence in the city. Naturally, the response is invariably negative, justified by the court’s rationale that defendants either utilize legal aid or can afford private counsel, thereby absolving the court of considering the defendant’s financial capacity.
This realization—learned after over three years of societal ‘baptism’ by Hong Kong residents—underscores a fundamental principle: one’s financial status should not influence professional obligations. Neither impoverished nor affluent individuals warrant preferential treatment or free legal advice from me; I owe nothing to either. My stance extends to those who flaunt wealth and seek gratis counsel in exchange for future favors—such individuals, I believe, do not deserve my engagement, as my time is as valuable as theirs. The wealth disparity matters; however, it is equally critical to invest in meaningful endeavors and worthy individuals.
Just as in the UK, the value of a person’s time should not be dismissed merely because they retain legal aid or private legal services. If I could address the UK government directly, I would question why, despite allocating over £2 billion in aid to Ukraine, a fraction—less than a tenth—fails to be dedicated toward enhancing the operational efficacy of British courts. Do policymakers realize the extent to which the judicial system’s resources are critically inadequate?
The misconception that clients hiring private lawyers are inherently wealthy, thereby justifying the squandering of legal time, is merely a manifestation of resentment toward affluence—yet such resentment is, paradoxically, a catalyst for societal impoverishment. Even if clients do not begrudge paying unnecessary legal fees, the time lawyers expend might be better directed toward societal contributions. Ultimately, one must question whether such expenditure truly benefits society at large.
Society’s prevailing narrative often vilifies the wealthy, portraying them as callous or morally bankrupt, while idolizing the impoverished as paragons of virtue and righteousness. This dichotomy overlooks the reality that individuals with integrity and strong moral character are more likely to succeed and amass wealth. Hence, societal structures should not perpetuate punitive attitudes against those willing to give and contribute. Our ancestral origins, rooted in hunting and resource-sharing practices, laid the foundation for economic exchange and social advancement through barter—a process that engendered the sophisticated societal fabric we strive to sustain today. Reflecting on this, one must question whether the so-called society of boundless love genuinely fosters inclusion and supports hard work or merely functions as an excuse for shortcomings and a sacrifice of genuine effort, forgetting that the successful also form an integral part of society.
Chinese Version : 天平的傾斜 仇恨財富是貧窮的開端
📢 Join the “UK Life & Current Affairs Channel” (DOVC.co.uk) Community! 🇬🇧
👋 Want to stay up-to-date on the latest UK life information, news, current affairs, policy changes, or share experiences with fellow Brits? Welcome to join the UK Life & Current Affairs Channel (DOVC.co.uk) to discuss and share useful information together!
📌 Community Features: ✅ Real-time updates on UK current affairs and policies ✅ Exchange of information on UK life, immigration, work, study, etc. ✅ Mutual support with like-minded friends
📲 Join us now!
🔹 WhatsApp Group 👉 Click here to join 🔹 Facebook Fan Page 👉 Follow us
Welcome to join us and explore UK life together! 🎉
Henry Wong qualified as a solicitor in Hong Kong, England and Wales, Ireland and Scotland respective in 2014, 2018, 2024 and 2025. Henry is fluent in Cantonese, Mandarin, English, and Japanese, and he specialises in a broad range of legal matters, including family law (possessing significant experience in divorce, assets division, and child arrangements), criminal litigation, civil litigation, and international law, with a focus on human rights and criminal law. He additionally manages various immigration-related matters, encompassing refugee applications, settlement and naturalisation applications, work visa applications, and actively conducts BNO settlement and naturalisation seminars in the UK to provide professional information to communities in need.
Henry Wong is dedicated to public welfare and community affairs. He is currently the founder of Hong Kong Professionals CIC (hkpcic.org.uk) and Descendants of Victoria City (dovc.co.uk), where he actively participates in community building and consistently advocates for various human rights issues.
At present, Henry serves as a consultant solicitor for David Fenn & Co. in Hong Kong and Perilli & Ho Solicitors in London. He is also a legal link partner with Jones Whyte Solicitors in Scotland. His practice area is extensive, encompassing the sale and purchase of residential and commercial properties in both Hong Kong and the United Kingdom, immigration matters, various civil and criminal litigation cases, commercial and contractual matters, family disputes, wills and estate administration, as well as human rights law.
Outside of his professional commitments, Henry Wong enjoys sports and is a goalkeeper for an amateur football team. He also possesses a passion for wine, possesses a deep understanding of various types of alcoholic beverages, and is skilled in making cocktail.
黃律師於2014年成為香港執業律師，2018年取得英格蘭及威爾斯執業律師資格，2024年取得愛爾蘭註冊律師資格，並於2025年獲得蘇格蘭律師資格。黃律師精通廣東話、普通話、英語及日語，擅長處理多項法律事務，包括家事法（尤其於離婚、財產分配及子女撫養權安排方面經驗豐富）、刑事訴訟、民事訴訟，以及國際法（專注於人權及刑事領域）。此外，黃律師亦處理各類移民相關事宜，包括難民申請、定居及入籍申請、工作簽證申請等，並積極於英國舉辦BNO定居及入籍講座，為有需要的社群提供專業資訊。
黃律師熱心公益及地區事務，現為 Hong Kong Professionals CIC (hkpcic.org.uk) 及 Descendants of Victoria City (dovc.co.uk) 的創辦人，積極參與社區建設，並對不同人權議題持續發聲。
目前，黃律師擔任香港 David Fenn and Co. 律師行及英國 Perilli & Ho Solicitors 律師行的顧問律師，同時也是蘇格蘭 Jones Whyte Solicitors 的合作夥伴。其執業範圍廣泛，涵蓋香港及英國住宅及商業物業買賣、移民入境事務、各類民事及刑事訴訟、商業及合約事宜、家庭糾紛、遺囑及遺產處理，以及人權法等。
工作之餘，黃律師熱愛運動，擔任業餘足球隊的守門員。同時，他也對品酒情有獨鍾，對各類酒品均有深入研究，更擅長調製各式雞尾酒。
